Are religious believers nicer people than non-believers?

article34
“…you are able to read this article on a computer without someone coming to lock you up, torture your family and dump you in a mass grave because of the cultural hegemony that Judeo-Christianity built.”


Notice I didn’t say better people in the title. I am not going to argue that becoming a believer makes a person somehow a superior kind of being (dogmatic theologians may disagree) but a recent major study suggests that they may well be nicer, more altruistic and other-focused.

In the blogosphere this past week, at least in the corner of it that I inhabit, there was a bit of a ruckus around some findings in a massive study co-authored by Harvard professor Robert D Putnam and Notre Dame’s David Campbell that seems to show that believers are more civic minded and altruistic than their secular counterparts and also;

“They are more likely to give blood, money to a homeless person, financial aid to family or friends, a seat to a stranger and to spend time with someone who is ”a bit down”

Of course, there will always be exceptions. Fred Hollows was reputedly an atheist but his focus on the needs of others is legendary. There may well be people in your street who split their time between volunteering for the local S.E.S. or Bush Fire Brigade and also chair the local chapter of Atheists for a God Free Universe, but what we want to look at is the metadata, the overall cultural impact of what large groups of people believe.

Atheists like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris only get media coverage because they are iconoclasts. They are like teenagers who like to shock their parents with their edgy subversive ideas. Ho hum! It’s not exactly new and it’s also the same philosophical anthropology that got 125 million people killed in the 20th century.

In contrast, what is the cultural impact when large numbers of people within a culture live within the broad tenets of the Judeo-Christian faith tradition. Best I can tell, you seem to get things like this; an end to slavery, hospitals, large and well run education systems, natural law, freedom, rights, democracy, charity, extraordinary art, music and literature.

Again, not all these things are exclusively the premise of believers but overall people of faith have built the Western tradition and you are able to read this article on a computer without someone coming to lock you up, torture your family and dump you in a mass grave because of the cultural hegemony that Judeo-Christianity built. It makes me wonder about all those black-armband types that talk of Western Imperialism etc etc. I am not sure they would have the same options in large parts of the world.

In summary, if, on average, despite the odd whacko, believers make the world safer, more altruistic and more pleasant to be in, then why are we afraid to share that with out students?

Have your say below!

Tags:, , ,

6 comments


  • I know plenty of lovely non-believers, that are sometimes even nicer than the Catholics I know, but I think having faith adds another element of thinking to your actions. Hopefully, anyway.
    It reminds me of Evelyn Waugh, author of Brideshead Revisted.
    According to an literary anecdote, the author Nancy Mitford had asked Waugh how he could behave so abominably and yet still consider himself a practicing Catholic. “You have no idea,” had Waugh replied, “how much nastier I would be if I was not a Catholic. Without supernatural aid I would hardly be a human being.”

    September 21, 2011
  • Sam

    What it means to be a nice person is highly subjective and is difficult to pin down. No doubt many people will view Richard Dawkins as “a nice person”. For the record, I don’t. But what does this mean? A more interesting epistemological enquiry would be to ask what makes a person a good person? Why? Because atheism fails. How does it fail? By the nihilistic corollary that ensues from it’s basic premise that denies a transcendental reality. What does that mean? It means that, logically speaking, atheists are selfish, moral rectitude is nothing but an appeal to number and all charitable acts of good will are self-orientated acts of gratification and self indulgence. All apparent acts of genuine altruistic kindness, love and compassion disprove atheism as an ideology. I doubt that many people seriously believe this, whether they identify as atheist or theist. After all, fervent belief alone does nothing to prove and back up an argument so no matter how honestly people may shout the atheistic views, the truth remains that actions speak louder than words.

    September 23, 2011
  • Chris

    It has been a matter of frequent observation, during my long life, that Catholics and other Christians can be identified by their kindness to strangers and their altruism. You don’t always find out the theism/atheism of strangers, but I have found that, on the many occasions when I do engage with unknown people and learn a little of their background, almost invariably they have this denominational setting.

    Of course, the old nature vs nurture argument applies: but I believe it’s a moot point whether these folk are intrinsically nice or were reared that way.

    Nonetheless I can anecdotally support the Harvard study here. It’s nice for the academics when they get one right!

    September 29, 2011
  • Mark

    I’m not sure this article or discussion serves any good purpose. Compassion please not judgement.

    October 11, 2011
    • Jonathan Doyle

      Hi Mark,
      Thanks for the post. I am not sure there is judgement here more like empirically verifiable research from one of the worlds most prestigious universities. My sense is that when the benefits of a religious worldview are documented the response in mainstream media is that some form of judgement is being passed in a pejorative sense. If the data is accurate and verifiable then it would lack compassion not to share it.

      October 11, 2011
    • Matthew Godwin

      I agree whole heartedly with Mark. Jesus had no time for pious Pharisees. I have experienced the most loathsome, unChristian behaviour on several occasions within Catholic communities. Although I’m working in a Catholic school again (& was educated at Catholic primary, secondary & university), I have little time for church goers as I have found them repeatedly to be hypocritical, mean-spirited and couldn’t be living further from the leadership Jesus gave us on how to treat people. Sad but true for me.

      October 21, 2011

Leave a comment


Name*

Email(will not be published)*

Website

Your comment*

 
Submit Comment

© Copyright Being Catholic - Designed by Five by Five